Criminal Justice System Procedures

Topics: United States, Crime, Punishment Pages: 3 (777 words) Published: December 11, 2012

MODULE 1 case

Jessica M. Tabor

TUI University


I believe that the president has established a policy that backs what the United States is trying and overall is the backbone of this country which is freedom and a certain respect for all of its citizens of certain rights. With that being said, its thought that by setting this standard to treat rules of the UCMJ violators differently but with the same respect within the country while other countries could care less how they treat their violators of crimes is much different. As the U.S gives the same rights to defendants of other countries to a trail and a lawyer with certain respect and privileges sometimes seems a little much. We will give them their rights to a trail and the support but overall they might still be just as guilty, but procedure is procedures.

The tribunal does not seem to violate the procedures of criminal justice because it does not seem to target the only crimes that are usually in a civil criminal trial matters. The UCMJ is meant for military members or anyone involved with a military affiliation during a time in war in connection with crimes accused against them. They are given the same rights to have a trial and to contact a lawyer. In connection with the crime the military will conduct its own trail which may include a civilian defense attorney if needed. When a violator of the UCMJ is presumed guilty and charged with an article, they are punished in different ways then civilian members in a civilian trail. Military members have their own set of punishments different from civilian punishments, but even worse foreign terrorist will usually rot or be punished to death.

Another difference between civilian and military is the way the prosecution and trail is held which in the civilian sector it can be publicly viewed but with military its only open to the witness, prosecution, defendant...

Cited: Draft of Tribunal Rules Would Require Public Trials, Death-Penalty Unanimity
By Jess Bravin. Wall Street Journal. (Eastern edition). New York, N.Y.: Dec 28, 2001. pg. A.18
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Crime and the Criminal Justice System Essay
  • Criminal Justice System Paper week 1 paper
  • Improving the Criminal Justice System Essay
  • Criminal Justice System Essay
  • Criminal Justice System Essay
  • Components of the Criminal Justice System Essay
  • Criminal Justice Trends Essay
  • The Necessity of a Criminal Justice System Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free