Kent V. United States

Topics: Supreme Court of the United States, Judge, Criminal law Pages: 2 (647 words) Published: December 5, 2010
Kent V. United States
Regarded as the first major juvenile rights case to preface further juvenile court reforms, Kent v. United States established the universal precedents of requiring waiver hearings before juveniles could be transferred to the jurisdiction of a criminal court and juveniles being entitled to consult with counsel prior to and during such hearings. Morris A. Kent, Jr., first came under the authority of the Juvenile Court of the District of Columbia in 1959. He was then aged 14. He was apprehended as a result of several housebreakings and an attempted purse snatching. He was placed on probation, in the custody of his mother, who had been separated from her husband since Kent was two years old. Juvenile Court officials interviewed Kent from time to time during the probation period, and accumulated a "Social Service" file. On September 2, 1961, an intruder entered the apartment of a woman in the District of Columbia. He took her wallet. He raped her. The police found in the apartment latent fingerprints. They were developed and processed. They matched the fingerprints of Morris Kent, taken when he was 14 years old and under the jurisdiction of the Juvenile Court. At about 3 p.m. on September 5, 1961, Kent was taken into custody by the police. Kent was then 16, and therefore subject to the "exclusive jurisdiction" of the Juvenile Court. He was still on probation to that court as a result of the 1959 proceedings. Kent was detained on a Receiving Home for one week. During that period, there was no arraignment and no determination by a judicial officer of the probable cause for Kent’s arrest. His attorney filed a motion with the juvenile court opposing the waiver as well as a request to inspect records relating to Kent’s previous offenses. A psychiatric examination of Kent was arranged by his attorney. His attorney argued that because his client was “a victim of severe psychopathology” it would be in Kent’s best interest to remain within the juvenile...
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Korematsu V. the United States (1944) Essay
  • Supreme Court of the United States Essay
  • United States Constitution and Brianna Molnar Date Essay
  • Korematsu vs. the United States Essay
  • Essay on Gonzales V Kalaw Katigbak Digest
  • U.S V. Korematsu Essay
  • Us V. Morrison Essay
  • Case Analysis Texas V. Johnson Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free