A Time to Kill Movie Questions
In this movie criminal law is displayed.
The Jury selection process was that there were many possible jurors, and the two lawyers picked who got to be on the jury during the trail, 6 choice for each lawyer. The lawyers based their designs on stereotypical stereotypes such as white will always feel that black is guilty, and other factors that contributed to what each lawyer wanted. I feel as though this is fair in the sense that each lawyer picks who they want, and no its not fair that they are choosing people that they know what they're final verdict will be. In todays society there is defiantly still some tension when it comes to race, and I feel as though those opinions and beliefs comes from the old fashion ways of thinking passed on from one generation to the next. This movie does not change my opinion on the fact that I strongly believe the law should be upheld whether the person is black or white. I do believe that the white men would have been found guilty in that day, especially with a confession on paper, I do also believe that these men knew exactly what they were doing which makes their crime that much worse ( Mens Rea), I also strongly believe that no matter the situation if the person committed a crime as cruel as rape whether they were in the right mind or not should be put away. The term Actus Reus is basically saying guilty mind, and that a person must be proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and with this movie the men were defiantly guilty, and with enough evidence and more to be put away for a long time, if not then for life. If i was Carl Lee I would have done what he did and more. I don’t think dying is the worst thing that could happen to someone, I would feel as though them being tutored is beyond justified and although some may argue that life in prison would be worse than death I do not agree. How is it fair that a person commits a crime that will alter their victims life for the worst, and effect...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document